Tree

Decisions behind closed doors

How the decisions were made

The planning changes were developed in secret, yet industry had a voice.

Consultation with the community on Activity Centre boundaries and heights was performative and lacked essential detail. Councils received limited information and had little, if any, influence on outcomes.

The Government has refused to release the modelling and advice upon which decisions about the first 35 Activity Centres were made.

Independent scrutiny either did not occur or was rushed and compromised. Expected consultation was waived.

Power has been concentrated in the hands of the Planning Minister.

No transparency. No scrutiny. No meaningful say.


Explore further

  • Concerns Community and Council locked out
    See how centralised planning powers have removed the ability of communities and councils to influence decisions that shape their neighbourhoods.

  • Concerns Community consultation and engagement
    See how consultation failed to give communities the information, time and genuine opportunity needed to understand and respond to what was being planned.