Bulldozing Melbourne: The Apartment & Tower Takeover
The plan for Melbourne’s established suburbs
Melbourne is being reshaped through sweeping planning changes. This is not only a housing plan. And change is not only happening in the sixty Activity Centres and at the six Suburban Rail Loop stations. It is happening everywhere housing can be built. These changes are a series of top-down decisions about what our suburbs become — about how and where future generations shall live.
These sweeping changes have been justified by the false beliefs that the planning system is the cause of insufficient housing supply and that greater supply will improve affordability. It is now the development industry, not councils and communities, that will determine the liveability of our homes, neighbourhoods, towns and cities.
Importantly, this is not a choice between the Government’s planning model and urban sprawl. There are many ways to accommodate housing growth. The question is who does this Government’s approach actually serve and whether it will deliver what is promised: housing growth and improved affordability in locations where people will want to live.
The bigger picture comprises six interconnected parts that together reveal a single planning model designed to deliver a city of apartments, including throughout Melbourne’s established suburbs.
For those wishing to explore these issues in greater detail, further information is available throughout the Government plans, Concerns, Resources and Heritage at risk sections of this website.
-

Melbourne rebuilt as a city of apartments
Read more: Melbourne rebuilt as a city of apartmentsWhat has been imposed? A planning framework that opens established suburbs to apartment blocks and towers, with height limits that can be exceeded. Not just in the sixty Activity Centres or SRL precinct. In any street.
-

Communities left in the dark
Read more: Communities left in the darkMost Victorians know little about the planning changes. Fewer still understand how they fit together.
-

Developer yield vs liveability & good planning: What communities stand to lose
Read more: Developer yield vs liveability & good planning: What communities stand to loseLiveability sacrificed by lower building standards – loss of character, gardens, tree canopy, heritage, climate resilience, sunlight, privacy, infrastructure and sustainability. Communities lose their say.
-

Decisions behind closed doors
Read more: Decisions behind closed doorsNo transparency. No scrutiny. Imposed by the State. Controlled by the Planning Minister.
-

Promises without proof
Read more: Promises without proofAffordability not guaranteed. Infrastructure not planned or funded. Evidence withheld.
-

A false choice
Read more: A false choiceIt’s not apartments everywhere or urban sprawl. Melbourne has more than one way to grow.
More homes. Done better.
Melbourne needs more homes. Boroondara has a housing target of 65,500 new dwellings by 2051. Transparent decision-making, genuine consultation, independent scrutiny and a long-term vision for complete, liveable communities are essential for community trust.
Piecemeal, market-led redevelopment, driven one site at a time, puts the liveability of future generations in the hands of developers, with no guarantee of affordability. It will not deliver housing at scale for young Victorians and families.
Explore further
- Government plans →
Understand how the planning changes fit together. - Concerns →
Explore the evidence behind community concerns. - Heritage at risk →
See why heritage protections may no longer be enough.